Supreme Court’s Landmark Judgment in Tarsem Lal vs Directorate of Enforcement: ED Has No Power to Arrest for Complaints Registered Under Section 44(1)(b) of PMLA, 2002 Lex Summary
· 15 min read

Supreme Court’s Landmark Judgment in Tarsem Lal vs Directorate of Enforcement: ED Has No Power to Arrest for Complaints Registered Under Section 44(1)(b) of PMLA, 2002

Discover The Supreme Court’s landmark judgment in Tarsem Lal vs Directorate of Enforcement demystifies arrest powers under PMLA when the Special Court seizes cognizance on the complaint preferred under Section 44(1)(b) of PMLA. Get insights on the court’s findings, interplay of PMLA and CrPC, applicability of anticipatory bail, and implications for accused and agencies

Supreme Court’s Landmark Ruling on Section 102(3) Cr.P.C: What You Need to Know About Seizure Reporting Delays. Lex Summary
· 8 min read

Supreme Court’s Landmark Ruling on Section 102(3) Cr.P.C: What You Need to Know About Seizure Reporting Delays.

Discover the Supreme Court’s landmark ruling on Section 102(3) Cr.P.C. and its impact on seizure reporting delays. Learn about the balance between procedural compliance and police powers, the implications for law enforcement, and the protection of citizens’ rights. Get insights into the court’s authoritative pronouncement and its significance for legal professionals.

Safeguarding Dignity and Preventing Bias in Police History Sheets: Supreme Court’s Recent Judgment on Maintenance of Police History Sheets and Surveillance Register. Lex Summary
· 5 min read

Safeguarding Dignity and Preventing Bias in Police History Sheets: Supreme Court’s Recent Judgment on Maintenance of Police History Sheets and Surveillance Register.

Discover how the recent Supreme Court ruling reshapes police history sheets & survilence records, emphasizing dignity and bias prevention. Explore the case of Amanatullah Khan versus The Commissioner of Police, Delhi & Ors, where guidelines were issued to protect minors and innocent individuals names from history sheets & survelence records. Uncover directives urging alignment with Delhi Police’s standing order to ensure privacy and non-discrimination. This judgment sets a precedent for meticulous record-keeping while prioritizing vulnerable groups’ rights. It marks a pivotal step towards balanced surveillance and fundamental rights protection.

Preliminary assessment by the Juvanile Justice Board is mandatory and the procedures laid down under Juvenile Justice Act, 2015, during the trial proceeding ought to be strictly followed- Supreme Court. Lex Summary
· 5 min read

Preliminary assessment by the Juvanile Justice Board is mandatory and the procedures laid down under Juvenile Justice Act, 2015, during the trial proceeding ought to be strictly followed- Supreme Court.

Discover how a recent Supreme Court ruling has reinforced the vital importance of procedural integrity within India’s juvenile justice system. Delving into the case of Thirumoorthy vs. State Rep. by the Inspector of Police, the court’s stringent directives highlight the necessity for strict adherence to the Juvenile Justice Act, 2015. Learn about the pivotal role of preliminary assessments by the Juvenile Justice Board, the repercussions of procedural lapses, and the legal ramifications of bypassing mandated procedures. Gain insights into how legal professionals can safeguard the rights of juvenile offenders and uphold due process in light of this groundbreaking judgment.