Latest Articles

April 2026
Passive Euthanasia & Right to Die with Dignity: Supreme Court Clarifies CANH as Medical Treatment in Landmark 2026 Ruling Lex Summary
· 16 min read

Passive Euthanasia & Right to Die with Dignity: Supreme Court Clarifies CANH as Medical Treatment in Landmark 2026 Ruling

This article discusses the Supreme Court’s clarification on Section 29A(5) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, addressing whether an application for extending the time limit to pass an arbitral award can be filed after the expiry of the prescribed period. Learn how the court’s ruling affects arbitration timelines and tribunal mandates

Supreme Court Clarifies Whether an Application for Extension Under Section 29A(5) Can Be Filed After the Expiry of Time for Passing an Award. Lex Summary
· 7 min read

Supreme Court Clarifies Whether an Application for Extension Under Section 29A(5) Can Be Filed After the Expiry of Time for Passing an Award.

This article discusses the Supreme Court’s clarification on Section 29A(5) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, addressing whether an application for extending the time limit to pass an arbitral award can be filed after the expiry of the prescribed period. Learn how the court’s ruling affects arbitration timelines and tribunal mandates

An Analysis of Implied Consent in Arbitration Proceedings Continuing Beyond 12 Months: A Brief Examination in Light of the Madras High Court’s Recent 2024 Judgment. Lex Summary
· 6 min read

An Analysis of Implied Consent in Arbitration Proceedings Continuing Beyond 12 Months: A Brief Examination in Light of the Madras High Court’s Recent 2024 Judgment.

Explore the concept of implied consent in arbitration proceedings under Section 29-A of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, focusing on the recent 2024 Madras High Court judgment in Ayyasamy vs. Shanmugavel. Understand the implications of continuing arbitration beyond the 12-month statutory limit.

Authorities should verify whether a supplier has defaulted on tax payments before reversing the ITC. The Delhi High Court has remanded the matter as there was no proper examination. Lex Summary
· 2 min read

Authorities should verify whether a supplier has defaulted on tax payments before reversing the ITC. The Delhi High Court has remanded the matter as there was no proper examination.

The Delhi High Court quashed the Adjudicating Authority’s order for reversing Input Tax Credit (ITC) against Hanuman Industrial Corporation due to a lack of evidence proving supplier defaults in tax payments. The court emphasized the need for clear proof of non-compliance by suppliers under the GST law.